Books Download A History of Modern Britain Online Free

Identify Books In Pursuance Of A History of Modern Britain

Original Title:	A History of Modern Britain
ISBN:	1405005386 (ISBN13: 9781405005388)
Edition Language:	English
Characters:	Joseph Stalin, John Maynard Keynes, Tony Blair, John Lennon, Ian Smith, Harold Wilson, Dwight D. Eisenhower, Mick Jagger, Charles de Gaulle, Louis Mountbatten, 1st Earl Mountbatten of Burma, Spike Milligan, Saddam Hussein, Nikita Khrushchev, Guy Burgess, Anthony Eden, Friedrich Hayek, Lyndon B. Johnson, Enoch Powell, Harold Macmillan, Tony Benn, David Blunkett, Edward Heath, John Prescott, Aneurin Bevan, Clement Attlee, Winston Churchill, Gamal Abdel Nasser, Margaret Thatcher
Setting:	Britain

A History of Modern Britain

Andrew Marr

Hardcover | Pages: 629 pages

Rating: 4.02 | 2450 Users | 146 Reviews

Relation Conducive To Books A History of Modern Britain

In many ways this is quite a conservative history of modern Britain. My knowledge of that history isn’t brilliant, and so this did serve the purpose I read it for – to get a thumbnail overview. That said, it must be remembered this is written by a journalist, rather than an historian and I think that shows.

So, what does that mean? I think people might well disagree with me that this was conservative – I mean, there are places where he clearly supports the path taken by the Labour Party over the Conservatives – but that isn’t really what I mean. There are also parts where he is literally quite conservative – particularly in his rather standard attack on the move to more progressive education practices from the 1960s onward. What is never acknowledged in these rants – they do tend to be rants, unfortunately – is that from about the 1960s on mass education started to really ‘bite’. This meant that entire groups of people whose families had never before been educated were now being educated. He mentions that the upper classes were still being educated in pretty much the same way as they always had been – but that is precisely my point. The upper classes were arriving at school with academic capital that simply wasn’t available to the others in society confronting mass education. That teachers found they needed to ‘start where the students were at’ and to present ‘student-centred lessons’ is so often, by conservatives at least, presented as the root of all evil – but in fact, what else could have been done? The fact is that what is so often advocated as traditional values or common sense approaches to education could not be either in the case of the students affected in this entirely new world. Tradition is hardly relevant in a completely new situation.

But even this is not really the conservatism I’m referring to. Another aspect of it is the book's very close focus on the history of great men (and woman – given Thatcher) as the kind of history that truly deserves attention. The vast majority of this book is a telling of the story of the governing of Britain. And this is fine – this is one of the things I was hoping to get out of the book – but it really does position the book fairly squarely in a particular genre of history telling. The idea that history is really the story of the great and powerful.

Now, some may argue that he talks of the influence of music and fashion and the arts (particularly drama and humour) and that these add detail to the overall picture being presented. My concern is that these would, being generous, account for only under a third of the total narrative presented here (I would need to check, but I would suspect I'm being incredibly generous). And again, even in the story of the lower middle class boys going on to become The Beatles, say, we haven’t really left the realm of the great and powerful, have we?

There is a nice bit which I think shows what this book could have been. Following the war there was a severe shortage of housing. At the same time, as Van Morrison would say, “all the soldiers came marching home / Love looks in their eyes.” Britain witnessed both a housing shortage and a baby boom. So, people were forced to live with their parents and in-laws – and so Marr speculates this might help to explain the popularity of the mother-in-law joke well into the 1970s. That is the sort of thing that makes an interesting history – life situations that directly impact on the kinds of lives that can be lived in a society and therefore that help to explain the national character. However, there was far too little of this. Too much time was spent looking at the decline of the Empire, obviously important, but perhaps not really something that gives as much insight into the British character as is often believed.

This history is also conservative in quite another way. I got the impression the whole way though that how things turned out was being presented by the author as the only way things could have turned out. The Thatcher revolution was not overturned by the Labour Party once it came to power in any meaningful sense, and so the Thatcher revolution must have been both necessary and inevitable. I'm not really arguing with this, but more with what he does then in leading up to the Thatcher revolution. He uses it to explain the previous history of Britain – which is either progressing by moving towards this inevitable revolution or pointlessly acting as a counter-revolutionary force whenever it seems to be backsliding away from the vision splendid that would be Thatcher's Britain. Such post-hoc explanations make for good stories – all that journalists are finally interested in, as they tell you themselves – but I feel they make for quite poor histories.

Like I said, I was looking for a book that gave me a helicopter view of the history of modern Britain. And that is what I got with this one. This starts virtually at the end of the Second World War and ends with Gordon Brown. It is a quick read, for what it sets out to do. But there is no question it could have been so much more.

List About Books A History of Modern Britain

Title	:	A History of Modern Britain
Author	:	Andrew Marr
Book Format	:	Hardcover
Book Edition	:	First Edition
Pages	:	Pages: 629 pages
Published	:	May 17th 2007 by MacMillan (first published 2007)
Categories	:	History. Nonfiction. Politics. Historical

Rating About Books A History of Modern Britain

Ratings: 4.02 From 2450 Users | 146 Reviews

Judge About Books A History of Modern Britain

I think Andrew Marr should have titled the book A history of Modern British Government. The Book was just talking about past british government and their policies. It will make a good text book for A level History and Political students than for ordinary people or immigrants who wants to learn about the Beauty of the Isle of Britain.

This book proved to be a surprisingly readable history of post-1945 Britain. While the book itself focused more strongly upon politics than social history, there were still rather good sections devoted to what set, say, the population of Britain in the 50s apart from the population in Britain today.While at times the book was a bit verbose and dry, for the most part Andrew Marr kept the tone remarkably accessible, and extensively quoted primary sources. The wry British humor is out in force when

This book was very helpful in filling in a strange vacuum of knowledge post 1945 which has always embarrassed me....what exactly happened re Suez? How did we end up with the power cuts and the 3 day week? All this and more, with balance.. enough facts to fill the gaps, yet brief enough on each episode to retain the attention. Should not have reached my age without knowing some of this stuff.

This will probably be the thickest book I read this year.Similar to my experience reading 'Cameron at 10' last year, learning about modern British history made me feel like I was at that bit of an SFF novel where a character learns about the background of their world and how the current crises have come about. Britain's confused relationships with America and continental Europe are a major thread throughout our post-WW2 history.Major catastrophes such as the Second World War cause major changes:

From WWII to the aftermath of Gulf War II, From Churchill to Blair. The book covers all of my life and a few years. My political awareness of general elections goes back to Wilson's first government. It was interesting to read through so much history and try to put my memories in. The writing style makes the book and easy (if long) read, and some of the connections it uncovers are fascinating. "There is nothing new under the sun" - even the sixties, even the eighties. Especially 'New Labour'.I

The book kept me intrigued and glued for the first part of the British story after the Second World War till the 1960's, but then it started to read like a political story of Britain which I found difficult to follow. There was far too much focus on politicians for my taste. More analysis and less personality focus would have been better in my opinion as Andrew Marr has an interesting view on events. I don't know what kept him from elaborating more?

This was a quick tour through political & social history of Britain since WW2. It's not a dry academic book - Andrew Marr writes in an easy, almost conversational way, freely sharing his opinions. I learned plenty of stuff that I should really have known already (like, what was the Suez crisis?).Unfortunately I listened to the abridged audio book which was just too compressed, so the narrative seemed to jump around and was a bit disjointed. (But it was still long enough for Marr's narration,