Books Download The Archaeology of Knowledge & The Discourse on Language Online Free

The Archaeology of Knowledge & The Discourse on Language

Michel Foucault

Paperback | Pages: 256 pages

Rating: 4.12 | 6036 Users | 156 Reviews

Itemize Books Supposing The Archaeology of Knowledge & The Discourse on Language

Original Title:	L'archéologie du savoir
ISBN:	0394711068 (ISBN13: 9780394711065)
Edition Language:	English
Literary Awards:	Премія «Сковорода» (2004)

Narration In Pursuance Of Books The Archaeology of Knowledge & The Discourse on Language

Librarian note: an alternate cover for this edition can be found here.

Madness, sexuality, power, knowledge—are these facts of life or simply parts of speech? In a series of works of astonishing brilliance, historian Michel Foucault excavated the hidden assumptions that govern the way we live and the way we think.

The Archaeology of Knowledge begins at the level of “things aid” and moves quickly to illuminate the connections between knowledge, language, and action in a style at once profound and personal. A summing up of Foucault’s own methodological assumptions, this book is also a first step toward a genealogy of the way we live now.

Challenging, at times infuriating, it is an absolutely indispensable guide to one of the most innovative thinkers of our time.

Be Specific About Containing Books The Archaeology of Knowledge & The Discourse on Language

Title	:	The Archaeology of Knowledge & The Discourse on Language
Author	:	Michel Foucault
Book Format	:	Paperback
Book Edition	:	Anniversary Edition
Pages	:	Pages: 256 pages
Published	:	September 12th 1982 by Vintage (first published March 27th 1969)
Categories	:	Philosophy. Nonfiction. Theory. History. Sociology. Academic

Rating Containing Books The Archaeology of Knowledge & The Discourse on Language

Ratings: 4.12 From 6036 Users | 156 Reviews

Assess Containing Books The Archaeology of Knowledge & The Discourse on Language

i swear, once your done reading foucault you feel as if you've taken in something deep. but the whole time im reading im like get to the point - sometimes he does. discourse, yup. this book has his famous remarks in the intro: "don't ask me who i am, don't ask me to stay the same blah blah... i hate that line. sounds like some hippie on a mundane acid trip. no wonder he moved to san francisco.

The Ur text, especially the appended text of Foucault's inaugural lecture at the College de France. Essential for understanding the divide between our discursive selves and the non-discursive reality that silently surrounds us.

I mean, it's amazing, but it is also kind of boring.

An important bit of theory on the subjective nature of all history, and how we might best understand it by approaching it with an archeologist's mindset and methods.

One of my dear friends told me that she believed Foucault had made feminism possible for women. He also made me want to put a stick in my eye, while I was reading this book. Really, Foucault? Do you really have to be so damned inscrutable??The rewards for making it to the end of Archaeology of Knowledge are so worth it, though. In his own way, Foucault pokes and prods until he completely convinces you that disciplines are little more than arbitrary, fragile, man-made constructions--artificial

Pre-genealogical Foucault. Labor intensive, but very much worth it.A professor recommended it to me in the early 90s, along with Lyotard's The Postmodern Condition and Jane Flax's Thinking Fragments as the essential texts to read for literary theory. (Another professor with a different theoretical background recommended concurrently therewith Eagleton's Ideology, Brantlinger's Crusoe's Footprints, and Belsey's Critical Practice; I dutifully read all that stuff, and be advised that the second set

I wanted to give Foucault a chance. He supposedly means so much to so many, but nobody can tell me en clear and easy language the why. The simple summary of him. The core in a few words. After reading this book I know why. Foucault is totally not tangible, there is nothing - not once that he manage to go past his jargon and make himself understandable. Every sentence he builds he makes unclear and hard to read, using words he gives own meanings and ways of explaining that needs paragraphs rather