Books Online Free To Explain the World: The Discovery of Modern Science Download
List Books In Favor Of To Explain the World: The Discovery of Modern Science
| ISBN: | 0141980877 (ISBN13: 9780141980874) |
| Edition Language: | English |
| Literary Awards: | Andrew Carnegie Medal Nominee for Nonfiction (2016) |
Steven Weinberg
Paperback | Pages: 432 pages Rating: 3.76 | 1585 Users | 147 Reviews
Specify Out Of Books To Explain the World: The Discovery of Modern Science
| Title | : | To Explain the World: The Discovery of Modern Science |
| Author | : | Steven Weinberg |
| Book Format | : | Paperback |
| Book Edition | : | First Edition |
| Pages | : | Pages: 432 pages |
| Published | : | February 1st 2016 by Penguin Books Ltd (first published February 10th 2015) |
| Categories | : | Science. History. Nonfiction. Physics. History Of Science. Philosophy |
Relation During Books To Explain the World: The Discovery of Modern Science
In To Explain the World, pre-eminent theoretical physicist Steven Weinberg offers a rich and irreverent history of science from a unique perspective - that of a scientist. Moving from ancient Miletus to medieval Baghdad to Oxford, and from the Museum of Alexandria to the Royal Society of London, he shows that the scientists of the past not only did not understand what we understand about the world - they did not understand what there is to understand. Yet eventually, through the struggle to solve such mysteries as the backward movement of the planets and the rise and fall of tides, the modern discipline of science emerged.Rating Out Of Books To Explain the World: The Discovery of Modern Science
Ratings: 3.76 From 1585 Users | 147 ReviewsWeigh Up Out Of Books To Explain the World: The Discovery of Modern Science
Some history of science books suffer from the problem that the authors don't actually know much science (or can't explain it). That's not a problem here. Weinberg gives superb accounts of technical astronomy up to Kepler (with one small exception having to do with the center of motion in Copernicus' system which I won't get into) and an incredibly lucid account of Newtonian mechanics. I confess I had never really understood why the earth should bulge at the equator before reading Weinberg's
A decent book tracing the progress from geometry-inspired philosophy in Ancient Greece to the 'discovery' of modern science based on experiment and observation in the 17th century. I read this book with a fair amount of prior knowledge, so I wasn't exactly blown away. To be honest, , I am a bit disappointed, since I expected some new, clever insights by a Nobel prize-winning author. Two of the strongest points of this book are: (1) the way it is written makes it easy to follow, even for the
(view spoiler)[Bettie's BooksThe rating, any status updates, and those bookshelves, indicate my feelings for this book. (hide spoiler)]
I gave this book 2 stars based on my opinion that the most valuable elements in a condensed book on the history of science (made for the general public) are:1. The author's selective inclusion of subjects/scientists2. The author's detailed analysis of the key scientists' achievements relative to the overall progress of his field or science in general.3. The author's analysis and commentary on factors contributing to the beginning of science and it's continued progress, the abolition of science
A very readable book for a layman, Weinberg explains what resources the ancient generation had and how science, especially physics in it's modern form, with observations from nature and theory go parallely and reinforce each other, came into being.The journey that he describes is the one from the Greeks at about 600 BC to Newton's around 1740. Contributions of philosophers, then called physicists(what a burn for physicists!) like Aristotle philophy derived from that of Empedocles of basic
Weinberg is a Nobel laureate and winner of a gazillion awards, which I had not known when I bought the book. It kinda became clear that he was a real physicist when he actually provided clear and detailed information on various theories (his discussion of Newton's theories was, um, a bit over my head, but I got the general idea). Anyhow, this is an interesting bit of research into how we came to think scientifically about the things we think we know about the world. (Or something that makes more
0 Comments