Download Books Fashionable Nonsense: Postmodern Intellectuals' Abuse of Science Online Free
Alan Sokal
Paperback | Pages: 320 pages Rating: 3.92 | 1701 Users | 152 Reviews
Itemize Books Supposing Fashionable Nonsense: Postmodern Intellectuals' Abuse of Science
| Original Title: | Impostures Intellectuelles |
| ISBN: | 0312204078 (ISBN13: 9780312204075) |
| Edition Language: | English |
Narration As Books Fashionable Nonsense: Postmodern Intellectuals' Abuse of Science
In 1996, Alan Sokal published an essay in the hip intellectual magazine Social Text parodying the scientific but impenetrable lingo of contemporary theorists. Here, Sokal teams up with Jean Bricmont to expose the abuse of scientific concepts in the writings of today's most fashionable postmodern thinkers. From Jacques Lacan and Julia Kristeva to Luce Irigaray and Jean Baudrillard, the authors document the errors made by some postmodernists using science to bolster their arguments and theories. Witty and closely reasoned, Fashionable Nonsense dispels the notion that scientific theories are mere "narratives" or social constructions, and explored the abilities and the limits of science to describe the conditions of existence.
Particularize Appertaining To Books Fashionable Nonsense: Postmodern Intellectuals' Abuse of Science
| Title | : | Fashionable Nonsense: Postmodern Intellectuals' Abuse of Science |
| Author | : | Alan Sokal |
| Book Format | : | Paperback |
| Book Edition | : | Special Edition |
| Pages | : | Pages: 320 pages |
| Published | : | October 29th 1999 by Picador (first published October 1st 1997) |
| Categories | : | Philosophy. Science. Nonfiction. Politics. Sociology. Criticism. Psychology |
Rating Appertaining To Books Fashionable Nonsense: Postmodern Intellectuals' Abuse of Science
Ratings: 3.92 From 1701 Users | 152 ReviewsComment On Appertaining To Books Fashionable Nonsense: Postmodern Intellectuals' Abuse of Science
It's sad to consider just how badly we still need books like this. More than two decades after its publication (1998) following the Sokal affaire (1996), "fashionable nonsense" still manages to lure people in by merging pseudo-scientific ramblings with grievances.When I first encountered texts from the likes of Deleuze, Lacan, and Irigaray as a philosophy student, my response was a mixture of puzzlement, amusement, and an overall "not my cup of tea" attitude. It seemed like harmless little fun,Some things need to be said. An enjoyable, somewhat academic discussion, but food for thought for those who feel comfortable with this genre.
Important and at times humorous book by Sokal and Brimont where they depict the pseudoprofundity of few post-modern "philosophers" of the 20th century and come to demonstrate how these charlatans abuse complex mathematical/hard-science concepts -which they got no clue about- into some meaningless set of social "theories". I honestly don't understand how some of these "intellectuals" were/are taken seriously, Lacan and Baudrillard then, today in the form of Ronell and Zizek. Additionally and
Oh, how badly the Left needs more books like this, boldly championing scientific objectivity and facts over political or spiritual ideologies that abuse science to gain legitimacy and further their agendas.The story of the origin of this book is a playful one: the author submitted a parody article, called Transgressing the Boundaries, to a postmodern scientific journal. In it he demonstrates every abuse of science he's seen, conflating subjects that have nothing to do with each other,
It's sad to consider just how badly we still need books like this. More than two decades after its publication (1998) following the Sokal affaire (1996), "fashionable nonsense" still manages to lure people in by merging pseudo-scientific ramblings with grievances.When I first encountered texts from the likes of Deleuze, Lacan, and Irigaray as a philosophy student, my response was a mixture of puzzlement, amusement, and an overall "not my cup of tea" attitude. It seemed like harmless little fun,
This book shows up some of the postmodernists and poststructuralists misuse and abuse of mathematics and science (especially physics). One of the authors, Alan Sokal, wrote a paper that mimics these types of scholars as a hoax, published in the postmodernist journal Social Text, which is included as appendix A, followed by some further comments in appendix B. The scholars, all I believe are tenured professors, hence why I am calling them scholars, are Jacques Lacan, Julia Kristeva, Luce
I think it's crucial that respectable academics stop purveying semantically vacuous nonsense that egregiously expropriates terms that have precise scientific meanings, with demonstrably no understanding whatever of those meanings, for the purpose of furthering an atmosphere of moral equivalency for sense and nonsense. (I use the word "respectable" contextually: the perpetrators of this furtherance of discursive entropy are respected by many of the academics within their own fields.)
0 Comments